[REL] Pornografia (2003)

Debaser

Re: [REL] Pornografia (2003)

Post by Debaser »   0 likes

I think it was just the manner in which the links were posted.

You wrote “sigh”, and then added god knows how many links within moments of me moving the thread to the general section and explaining the rules.

Adding unverified links in an instant and sighing just makes you look smug.
That would also make most people assume that you had posted verified links, even if that wasn’t your intention.
User avatar
emuler
Posts: 4617
Likes:
Joined: Sun Apr 02, 2006 1:00 am

Re: [REL] Pornografia (2003)

Post by emuler »   0 likes

After all this, I hope the damn thing is worth the download. :bigups RFF says topless. :(

btw. now that board etiquette is being disussed, what is the ruling about softcore? Many of the David Hamilton movies fall into that category (no plot to speak of). There are several other movies which fall into that genre, with girls in the same age group. Listed on IMDB too.
User avatar
idler
Posts: 1107
Likes:
Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2006 1:00 am

Re: [REL] Pornografia (2003)

Post by idler »   0 likes

Debaser wrote:Sighing just makes you look smug.
So be it. Next time I'll cry. :icon_1roflmao

@emuler: put "Hamilton" into the board search, and you will find them all...
Debaser

Re: [REL] Pornografia (2003)

Post by Debaser »   0 likes

btw. now that board etiquette is being disussed, what is the ruling about softcore? Many of the David Hamilton movies fall into that category (no plot to speak of). There are several other movies which fall into that genre, with girls in the same age group. Listed on IMDB too.
I dread it when that type of question comes up, mainly because no one can agree on it.

Some soft-core films star convincingly young girls in them, but allowing such films on FLM as the norm could then open up the floodgates to any soft-core that individuals feel fits the bill.

The Hamilton films have been the exception to the rule.
As far back as I can remember fans of young girls in movies often liked the Hamilton films as well.

I know I posted the Schulmadchen report series a long while back, but a few featured children, and so it made sense to post the complete series.
Of course I would have no problem at all if it was decided to delete the lot, including the Hamilton movies in the name of keeping this forum more OT.
@emuler: put "Hamilton" into the board search, and you will find them all...
Im pretty sure he knows they are on the board.
User avatar
emuler
Posts: 4617
Likes:
Joined: Sun Apr 02, 2006 1:00 am

Re: [REL] Pornografia (2003)

Post by emuler »   0 likes

We had a similar discussion with Russian Lolita. However, that was not listed at IMDB, so I didn't post any links.

There are other movies that feature girls that are either young or those that look young. The content too is similar to DH films ( without the soft focus he was so fond of ). My point (attn: idler) was that if DH and the Schulmadchen series are OK for FLM, why not other movies?

Eg. there is Joy a Moscou http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0378143/

[Image]

[Image]

[Image]


Another was Cat Girl Kiki released in the general forum.

There is no doubt that these girls are legal, but they look young (as opposed to those that are underage but look like grandmothers).
Debaser

Re: [REL] Pornografia (2003)

Post by Debaser »   0 likes

I see no problem in occasionally putting such films in the general section.
But I hope you can see the point I was making.

Perhaps we should just decided what can go in the release section on a case by case basis, pretty much the same way as we are already doing.

I was always in favour of the off-topic section we used to have.
But for now the general section is the place that gets lumbered with such stuff.
My point (attn: idler) was that if DH and the Schulmadchen series are OK for FLM, why not other movies?
I hope I made that a little clearer in my last post :)
User avatar
idler
Posts: 1107
Likes:
Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2006 1:00 am

Re: [REL] Pornografia (2003)

Post by idler »   0 likes

rapidshare-cd-links = Osloskop-ed2k-links
User avatar
Amadeus
Posts: 914
Likes:
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2007 1:00 am

Re: [REL] Pornografia (2003)

Post by Amadeus »   0 likes

Debaser wrote:Perhaps we should just decided what can go in the release section on a case by case basis, pretty much the same way as we are already doing.
Ditto!

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0090026/
Rich
Posts: 2820
Likes:
Joined: Sat Feb 21, 2004 1:00 am

Re: [REL] Pornografia (2003)

Post by Rich »   0 likes

Debaser wrote:
btw. now that board etiquette is being disussed, what is the ruling about softcore? Many of the David Hamilton movies fall into that category (no plot to speak of). There are several other movies which fall into that genre, with girls in the same age group. Listed on IMDB too.
I dread it when that type of question comes up, mainly because no one can agree on it.

Some soft-core films star convincingly young girls in them, but allowing such films on FLM as the norm could then open up the floodgates to any soft-core that individuals feel fits the bill.

The Hamilton films have been the exception to the rule.
As far back as I can remember fans of young girls in movies often liked the Hamilton films as well.

I know I posted the Schulmadchen report series a long while back, but a few featured children, and so it made sense to post the complete series.
Of course I would have no problem at all if it was decided to delete the lot, including the Hamilton movies in the name of keeping this forum more OT.
@emuler: put "Hamilton" into the board search, and you will find them all...
Im pretty sure he knows they are on the board.
Also see this thread posted in Posting Rules...

https://www.first-loves.net/forums/v ... fied+board

:)

If your not sure if a movie is allowed to be posted because it's not listed at IMDB then please feel free to give information about the movie to one of the admins here and we'll make a decision ;)
User avatar
Amadeus
Posts: 914
Likes:
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2007 1:00 am

Re: [REL] Pornografia (2003)

Post by Amadeus »   0 likes

Rapidshare 2CD Version has nice quality... Limited OT scenes.

[Image]

Wiped Out...
Post Reply