[REL] Pornografia (2003)
Re: [REL] Pornografia (2003)
I think it was just the manner in which the links were posted.
You wrote “sigh”, and then added god knows how many links within moments of me moving the thread to the general section and explaining the rules.
Adding unverified links in an instant and sighing just makes you look smug.
That would also make most people assume that you had posted verified links, even if that wasn’t your intention.
You wrote “sigh”, and then added god knows how many links within moments of me moving the thread to the general section and explaining the rules.
Adding unverified links in an instant and sighing just makes you look smug.
That would also make most people assume that you had posted verified links, even if that wasn’t your intention.
Re: [REL] Pornografia (2003)
After all this, I hope the damn thing is worth the download. RFF says topless.
btw. now that board etiquette is being disussed, what is the ruling about softcore? Many of the David Hamilton movies fall into that category (no plot to speak of). There are several other movies which fall into that genre, with girls in the same age group. Listed on IMDB too.
btw. now that board etiquette is being disussed, what is the ruling about softcore? Many of the David Hamilton movies fall into that category (no plot to speak of). There are several other movies which fall into that genre, with girls in the same age group. Listed on IMDB too.
Re: [REL] Pornografia (2003)
So be it. Next time I'll cry.Debaser wrote:Sighing just makes you look smug.
@emuler: put "Hamilton" into the board search, and you will find them all...
Re: [REL] Pornografia (2003)
I dread it when that type of question comes up, mainly because no one can agree on it.btw. now that board etiquette is being disussed, what is the ruling about softcore? Many of the David Hamilton movies fall into that category (no plot to speak of). There are several other movies which fall into that genre, with girls in the same age group. Listed on IMDB too.
Some soft-core films star convincingly young girls in them, but allowing such films on FLM as the norm could then open up the floodgates to any soft-core that individuals feel fits the bill.
The Hamilton films have been the exception to the rule.
As far back as I can remember fans of young girls in movies often liked the Hamilton films as well.
I know I posted the Schulmadchen report series a long while back, but a few featured children, and so it made sense to post the complete series.
Of course I would have no problem at all if it was decided to delete the lot, including the Hamilton movies in the name of keeping this forum more OT.
Im pretty sure he knows they are on the board.@emuler: put "Hamilton" into the board search, and you will find them all...
Re: [REL] Pornografia (2003)
We had a similar discussion with Russian Lolita. However, that was not listed at IMDB, so I didn't post any links.
There are other movies that feature girls that are either young or those that look young. The content too is similar to DH films ( without the soft focus he was so fond of ). My point (attn: idler) was that if DH and the Schulmadchen series are OK for FLM, why not other movies?
Eg. there is Joy a Moscou http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0378143/
[Image]
[Image]
[Image]
Another was Cat Girl Kiki released in the general forum.
There is no doubt that these girls are legal, but they look young (as opposed to those that are underage but look like grandmothers).
There are other movies that feature girls that are either young or those that look young. The content too is similar to DH films ( without the soft focus he was so fond of ). My point (attn: idler) was that if DH and the Schulmadchen series are OK for FLM, why not other movies?
Eg. there is Joy a Moscou http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0378143/
[Image]
[Image]
[Image]
Another was Cat Girl Kiki released in the general forum.
There is no doubt that these girls are legal, but they look young (as opposed to those that are underage but look like grandmothers).
Re: [REL] Pornografia (2003)
I see no problem in occasionally putting such films in the general section.
But I hope you can see the point I was making.
Perhaps we should just decided what can go in the release section on a case by case basis, pretty much the same way as we are already doing.
I was always in favour of the off-topic section we used to have.
But for now the general section is the place that gets lumbered with such stuff.
But I hope you can see the point I was making.
Perhaps we should just decided what can go in the release section on a case by case basis, pretty much the same way as we are already doing.
I was always in favour of the off-topic section we used to have.
But for now the general section is the place that gets lumbered with such stuff.
I hope I made that a little clearer in my last postMy point (attn: idler) was that if DH and the Schulmadchen series are OK for FLM, why not other movies?
Re: [REL] Pornografia (2003)
rapidshare-cd-links = Osloskop-ed2k-links
Re: [REL] Pornografia (2003)
Ditto!Debaser wrote:Perhaps we should just decided what can go in the release section on a case by case basis, pretty much the same way as we are already doing.
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0090026/
Re: [REL] Pornografia (2003)
Also see this thread posted in Posting Rules...Debaser wrote:I dread it when that type of question comes up, mainly because no one can agree on it.btw. now that board etiquette is being disussed, what is the ruling about softcore? Many of the David Hamilton movies fall into that category (no plot to speak of). There are several other movies which fall into that genre, with girls in the same age group. Listed on IMDB too.
Some soft-core films star convincingly young girls in them, but allowing such films on FLM as the norm could then open up the floodgates to any soft-core that individuals feel fits the bill.
The Hamilton films have been the exception to the rule.
As far back as I can remember fans of young girls in movies often liked the Hamilton films as well.
I know I posted the Schulmadchen report series a long while back, but a few featured children, and so it made sense to post the complete series.
Of course I would have no problem at all if it was decided to delete the lot, including the Hamilton movies in the name of keeping this forum more OT.
Im pretty sure he knows they are on the board.@emuler: put "Hamilton" into the board search, and you will find them all...
https://www.first-loves.net/forums/v ... fied+board
If your not sure if a movie is allowed to be posted because it's not listed at IMDB then please feel free to give information about the movie to one of the admins here and we'll make a decision
Re: [REL] Pornografia (2003)
Rapidshare 2CD Version has nice quality... Limited OT scenes.
[Image]
Wiped Out...
[Image]
Wiped Out...