[REL] Nudes of the World (1961)

[Phuzzy4242]

Nice find jezevex

There is IMDB link, so I think this is on-topic. Of course there are loads of amateur nudist movies out there that should not be posted here.

I don't think an IMDb link makes it on-topic. An RFF link maybe, but not an IMDb link.

Jezevex' point that an "acted" film could be considered more on-topic compared to one from, say, Russian Bare, is certainly valid, but do we really want to go there? I remember some of the discussions we had, especially when we were deciding to clean things up so it didn't appear FLM was promoting child exploitation after we found out other child-film-related boards didn't want anything to do with us because of the open comments of many posters prior to 2011. I didn't like those earlier days that much because I felt I had to hide that I was even coming here.

I think I've made my opinion pretty clear, now and in the past. What say the rest of the members?

[ghost]

For me this is the point:

It's off-topic in the sense we decided long ago this type of film wasn't where we wanted FLM to be. It's one thing for a film to incidentally have child nudity in it, it's another for a film to be here because it has nude children. It's the intent that matters because that's where accusations of child porn arise. We don't encourage nudist films just like we don't want the "Children in Cinema" clips. Having a minute of nudity in a 90-minute film means the emphasis was the film. A nudist movie's sole purpose is to show naked people and the CiC clips' sole purpose is to show naked kids.

On the other hand this "movie" even doesn't contains a child actress. We could consider this video as a documentary, but we have to be careful what content is posted ar flm.

[ARTHORIUS]

I know that here there're movies that included nudism/naturism scenes and they're OT cause are included in a "story"
About this ok there're OT scenes but it's not a real movie i think is more a documentary than a movie how say Ghost... even we like the "treasure" inside
So for me can be moved to documentaries...

[mimzy]

I don't think an IMDb link makes it on-topic. An RFF link maybe, but not an IMDb link.

IMDB link means it is a legit movie. My opinion (which is obviously not shared by most of the staff) has always been that any legit movie with underage nudity belongs to FLM. Speaking of nudism movies, we already have a precedent with [REL] Vyhnání z ráje (2001).

Anyway I'm happy this rarity was found. I don't think it's a documentary, though

[Phuzzy4242]

An IMDb listing makes it a legit movie but not necessarily an on-topic movie. An RFF listing usually means it's both. At least Vyhnání z ráje did have a "plot", along with [REL] Diary of a Nudist (1961), [REL] Garden of Eden (1954), and several others.

Right now the opinion whether this is off topic looks like a tie, so speak up and let me know what you think.

[Phuzzy4242]

I got a chance to watch this today. It certainly won't win any academy awards but it does have a plot of sorts and isn't an exploitation film so I'm moving it back to Releases.

[ghost]

I agree with you Phuzzy. End of the story.