[REL] Lolita (1997)

Debaser

[REL] Lolita (1997)

Postby Debaser » Tue Dec 19, 2006 7:18 pm  2 likes

As requested.

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0119558/

For the age doubters:

Since actress Dominique Swain was only 15 at the time of filming, a pillow had to be placed between her and Jeremy Irons' lap during all their scenes together.IMDB

Like this post to see ed2k links  [701.86 Mb]
shyguy
Posts: 27
Likes:
Joined: Sat Dec 02, 2006 1:00 am

Re: [REL] Lolita (1997)

Postby shyguy » Tue Dec 19, 2006 10:27 pm  0 likes

thanks for posting this much appreciated
Debaser

Re: [REL] Lolita (1997)

Postby Debaser » Tue Dec 19, 2006 11:12 pm  0 likes

Pleasure :)
User avatar
Amadeus
Posts: 914
Likes:
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2007 1:00 am

Re: [REL] Lolita (1997)

Postby Amadeus » Tue Dec 04, 2007 1:20 am  0 likes

Thank you Debaser. I've had the Deleted Scenes on this vid for years. Time to see the entire movie I think.

http://www.veoh.com/videos/e1075804xXHFSyD
User avatar
emuler
Posts: 4104
Likes:
Joined: Sun Apr 02, 2006 1:00 am

Re: [REL] Lolita (1997)

Postby emuler » Tue Dec 04, 2007 8:23 am  0 likes

I heard a body double was used for some of the scenes.
Debaser

Re: [REL] Lolita (1997)

Postby Debaser » Tue Dec 04, 2007 12:55 pm  0 likes

Thank you Debaser. I've had the Deleted Scenes on this vid for years. Time to see the entire movie I think


Ah yes, I know the scenes in question.
To be honest, the film is good enough without those scenes.

I know a few people that really slated this film, but I actually really enjoyed it.

For a start, Swain really was 15 :dance
I also think Jeremy Irons was excellent in this film, and I really could feel his frustration.
The scene when Swain runs up the stairs and wraps her legs around Irons!.... the poor poor man just wants to bang her into next Sunday, but he cant.

I heard a body double was used for some of the scenes.


I watched a documentary on Lolita a little while ago, and I am glad to reveal that a body double wasn’t used.
terry666
Posts: 509
Likes:
Joined: Mon Jan 02, 2006 1:00 am

Re: [REL] Lolita (1997)

Postby terry666 » Tue Dec 04, 2007 3:47 pm  0 likes

Debaser wrote:For a start, Swain really was 15 :dance


In the book, Lolita was 12.


Debaser wrote:I watched a documentary on Lolita a little while ago, and I am glad to reveal that a body double wasn’t used.


Who cares? In the scenes that matter, it's so dark you hardly see anything anyway...
Debaser

Re: [REL] Lolita (1997)

Postby Debaser » Tue Dec 04, 2007 5:17 pm  0 likes

In the book, Lolita was 12.


My point being, she wasnt 18 :)

Who cares? In the scenes that matter, it's so dark you hardly see anything anyway...


I think most of the scenes counted seeing as she was only 15 :)
terry666
Posts: 509
Likes:
Joined: Mon Jan 02, 2006 1:00 am

Re: [REL] Lolita (1997)

Postby terry666 » Tue Dec 04, 2007 6:03 pm  0 likes

Debaser wrote:
In the book, Lolita was 12.


My point being, she wasnt 18 :)


I was disappointed compared to other great movies like "Beau Pere" and "Laura". :( American sensibilities. Bah!

Debaser wrote:
Who cares? In the scenes that matter, it's so dark you hardly see anything anyway...


I think most of the scenes counted seeing as she was only 15 :)


I said that in response to the question of whether or not a body double was used. I meant to say it doesn't matter, since the scenes are too dark to tell who it was.
billanben
Posts: 1396
Likes:
Joined: Tue Feb 07, 2006 1:00 am

Re: [REL] Lolita (1997)

Postby billanben » Tue Dec 04, 2007 7:07 pm  0 likes

I think Sue lyons was 15 in original anyway ?

This is an example of a remake which (IMO) is better than the orif=ginal - there is much more suggestiveness and Dominique was perfect for this part. A fine film which I would recommend to everyone.

Return to “United States”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests