[REL] Waterworld (1994)

redcat
Posts: 332
Likes:
Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2006 1:00 am

[REL] Waterworld (1994)

Post by redcat »   1 likes

I don't post so many releases. This board give me more than I can give in return. There is so many treasures here. Thanks to all of you who help nicely all poor guys like me. :heart

I not find this one by searching but I'm pretty sure you all know Waterworld. To me it's the best Tina Majorino (Corrina, Corrina) movie. Long or short hairs, she have two pretty blue eyes. :heart


http://lostmoviesarchive.com/search.php ... mode=image

In 1994, it was the most expensive movie of the century. Especially because it was filmed on sea (or gigantic pool). Also lot of production late. Last association Kevin Costner - Kevin Reynolds after Dances with Wolves & Robin Hood. On 1994 Costner was the king of Hollywood. And all mothers all around the world called one of her son: Kevin. :icon_1roflmao


[Image][Image][Image][Image]


I downloaded this italian version but there is lot of others on Emule. Search for your own language (rus, pl, fr, spa, eng...)

Like this post to see ed2k links  [1.34 Gb]

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0114898/
User avatar
ghost
Site Admin
Posts: 6714
Likes:
Joined: Sun Mar 07, 2004 1:00 am

Re: [REL] Waterworld (1994)

Post by ghost »   0 likes

I don't know, why this movie wasn't before :think
Debaser

Re: [REL] Waterworld (1994)

Post by Debaser »   0 likes

Good suggestion redcat

I have no idea why this film was such a flop at the box office.
I actually really enjoyed it when I saw it all those years ago.
User avatar
Amadeus
Posts: 914
Likes:
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2007 1:00 am

Re: [REL] Waterworld (1994)

Post by Amadeus »   0 likes

One of my favorites, to say the least:

<embed src="http://www.veoh.com/veohplayer.swf?perm ... AutoPlay=0" allowFullScreen="true" width="540" height="438" bgcolor="#FFFFFF" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" pluginspage="http://www.macromedia.com/go/getflashplayer"></embed>
User avatar
emuler
Posts: 4598
Likes:
Joined: Sun Apr 02, 2006 1:00 am

Re: [REL] Waterworld (1994)

Post by emuler »   0 likes

The over hype killed it, I suppose. How much did they say they spent on the sets? Some $400 million? :bigups Too much publicity like that raises expectations to such a level that practically anything is a disappointment.
User avatar
ptguardian
Posts: 4479
Likes:
Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2008 1:00 am

Re: [REL] Waterworld (1994)

Post by ptguardian »   0 likes

always a good watch. :cool couple of ot moments for the trained eye ;) i have an hd-dvd of this (dead format now). very good picture quality. thank you Quilty for the very well sourced post.

:)
Debaser

Re: [REL] Waterworld (1994)

Post by Debaser »   0 likes

ptguardian wrote:always a good watch. :cool couple of ot moments for the trained eye ;) i have an hd-dvd of this (dead format now). very good picture quality. thank you Quilty for the very well sourced post.

:)
Sorry whats a a dead format? Not DVD I hope. Bluray sucks, hardly any choice compared to DVD's!
User avatar
ptguardian
Posts: 4479
Likes:
Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2008 1:00 am

Re: [REL] Waterworld (1994)

Post by ptguardian »   0 likes

Debaser wrote:
Sorry whats a a dead format? Not DVD I hope. Bluray sucks, hardly any choice compared to DVD's!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HD_DVD

:)
User avatar
emuler
Posts: 4598
Likes:
Joined: Sun Apr 02, 2006 1:00 am

Re: [REL] Waterworld (1994)

Post by emuler »   0 likes

er.. in what way does BluRay suck, except for the price, of course? Some older movies may not show a lot of difference since the source material isn't great, but for new movies the improvement is obvious if viewed on a large screen.

http://carltonbale.com/1080p-does-matter
Debaser

Re: [REL] Waterworld (1994)

Post by Debaser »   0 likes

emuler wrote:er.. in what way does BluRay suck, except for the price, of course? Some older movies may not show a lot of difference since the source material isn't great, but for new movies the improvement is obvious if viewed on a large screen.

http://carltonbale.com/1080p-does-matter
It sucks cos clever marketing has brainwashed so many people into thinking that they really must buy Bluray and shouldn’t settle for anything less than perfection, thus we have nation of unsatisfied people that are getting ripped off just to keep up with the joneses.
So eventually the less anal amongst us will probably end up having to buy Bluray because of the masses making it popular.

Switching from VHS to DVD is obviously a fine jump, but DVD to Bluray is just getting silly.
Post Reply