Warg wrote:Phuzzy4242 wrote:Nothing transparent about Maddie's costume, just the skin-color leotard which was chosen because it was skin-colored.
Obviously. But probably not for any erotical reasons - rather meaning a symbolical "birth suit" = her true self.
BTW: If it comes to cuteness I clearly prefer her younger sister Mackenzie ...
Sex sells and sexy children sell, even if people want to deny it. In marketing, nothing is left to chance. With the hundreds of other colors available, they chose THIS one intentionally to make her appear nude so people would watch her, even if - maybe
especially if - they're offended by it. Sia herself is one big marketing gimmick with her "you don't see me" hiding behind a screen as if that makes her performance better. Different, yes, but better? Not to me.
Sully23 wrote:Hey hey many have scandals but others do not Dakota fanning rises in his career just wait to make a paper where you see his white skin Grace Moretz Abigail Breslin there is nothing scandoloso in them and I would also like to see erotic roles and is that it is something 'artistic' the truth just like Maddie one says goodbye to her character and takes another stage
...
When she locked herself in the cage with Shia Labouf, the most critical ones thought it was a deplorable act, even though it is quite risky to create an artist with an adult man and society would not come to reason
Dakota Fanning appeared nude in
Very Good Girls. Chloe Moretz is 21 now and her film roles are getting more risquee, and I've heard she's a wild partier. I could be wrong - I don't travel in her circles - and I don't really care one way or the other. Seems like most, if not all, the child stars are damaged by the experience (see Corey Haim and many others).
From what I've heard of Shia Labouf's behavior off-camera, I wouldn't let him within 20' of any child. Again, I don't know with certainty, but he's another of those child actors and his adult behavior has been very erratic.