[REL] Walkabout (1971)

User avatar
Night457
Global Moderator
Posts: 3978
Likes:
Joined: Sat Dec 28, 2019 3:44 pm

Re: [REL] Walkabout (1971)

Post by Night457 »   0 likes

And finally, on the official actual censors (it is their job):
The British Board of Film Classification (BBFC) surmised Agutter was seventeen years old at the time of filming (she was actually sixteen when filming began in July 1969[15]), and therefore the scenes did not pose a problem when submitted to the BBFC in 1971 and later in 1998. The Protection of Children Act 1978 prohibited distribution and possession of indecent images of people under the age of sixteen so the issue of potential indecency had not been considered on previous occasions. However, the Sexual Offences Act 2003 raised the age threshold to eighteen which meant the BBFC was required to consider the scenes of nudity in the context of the new law when the film was re-submitted in 2011. The BBFC reviewed the scenes and considered them not to be indecent and passed the film uncut.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Walkabout ... #Reception
User avatar
Davros6
Posts: 158
Likes:
Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2023 7:54 pm

Re: [REL] Walkabout (1971)

Post by Davros6 »   0 likes

Personally, with movies, I think it should relate to what the law was at the time of the movie being made, because the movie was made according to the law at the time, so it was made lawfully, you can't make a movie and take into account what the laws might be in 20+ years time.
I drink therefore I am
User avatar
goku33
Posts: 773
Likes:
Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2022 12:11 pm
Location: The Machine

Re: [REL] Walkabout (1971)

Post by goku33 »   0 likes

Davros6 wrote: Tue May 23, 2023 11:52 pm Personally, with movies, I think it should relate to what the law was at the time of the movie being made, because the movie was made according to the law at the time, so it was made lawfully, you can't make a movie and take into account what the laws might be in 20+ years time.
I mean yes, they shouldn’t punish a director/producer retrospectively for that but culture has to be re-evaluated.. my only point is that 30 years ago (or more) some awful stuff was allowed (women’s rights, gay rights, children’s rights).

On the other hand I don’t like censorship years later as well. I think Madaloscenza is a good example of not allowing something that was allowed earlier (in Germany).

https://variety.com/2023/film/news/stev ... 235594163/#!

It would be interesting, imagine if there would be a new law that gives child actors who did nude scenes, more rights (in that they can stop any distribution of the old media). Similar to how in some states and countries they removed the statue of limitation for rape or child abuse.
Post Reply