[REL] Lolita (1997)
[REL] Lolita (1997)
As requested.
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0119558/
For the age doubters:
Since actress Dominique Swain was only 15 at the time of filming, a pillow had to be placed between her and Jeremy Irons' lap during all their scenes together.IMDB
Like this post to see ed2k links [701.86 Mb]
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0119558/
For the age doubters:
Since actress Dominique Swain was only 15 at the time of filming, a pillow had to be placed between her and Jeremy Irons' lap during all their scenes together.IMDB
Like this post to see ed2k links [701.86 Mb]
Re: [REL] Lolita (1997)
thanks for posting this much appreciated
Re: [REL] Lolita (1997)
Pleasure
Re: [REL] Lolita (1997)
Thank you Debaser. I've had the Deleted Scenes on this vid for years. Time to see the entire movie I think.
http://www.veoh.com/videos/e1075804xXHFSyD
Re: [REL] Lolita (1997)
I heard a body double was used for some of the scenes.
Re: [REL] Lolita (1997)
Ah yes, I know the scenes in question.Thank you Debaser. I've had the Deleted Scenes on this vid for years. Time to see the entire movie I think
To be honest, the film is good enough without those scenes.
I know a few people that really slated this film, but I actually really enjoyed it.
For a start, Swain really was 15
I also think Jeremy Irons was excellent in this film, and I really could feel his frustration.
The scene when Swain runs up the stairs and wraps her legs around Irons!.... the poor poor man just wants to bang her into next Sunday, but he cant.
I watched a documentary on Lolita a little while ago, and I am glad to reveal that a body double wasn’t used.I heard a body double was used for some of the scenes.
Re: [REL] Lolita (1997)
In the book, Lolita was 12.Debaser wrote:For a start, Swain really was 15
Who cares? In the scenes that matter, it's so dark you hardly see anything anyway...Debaser wrote:I watched a documentary on Lolita a little while ago, and I am glad to reveal that a body double wasn’t used.
Re: [REL] Lolita (1997)
My point being, she wasnt 18In the book, Lolita was 12.
I think most of the scenes counted seeing as she was only 15Who cares? In the scenes that matter, it's so dark you hardly see anything anyway...
Re: [REL] Lolita (1997)
I was disappointed compared to other great movies like "Beau Pere" and "Laura". American sensibilities. Bah!Debaser wrote:My point being, she wasnt 18In the book, Lolita was 12.
I said that in response to the question of whether or not a body double was used. I meant to say it doesn't matter, since the scenes are too dark to tell who it was.Debaser wrote:I think most of the scenes counted seeing as she was only 15Who cares? In the scenes that matter, it's so dark you hardly see anything anyway...
Re: [REL] Lolita (1997)
I think Sue lyons was 15 in original anyway ?
This is an example of a remake which (IMO) is better than the orif=ginal - there is much more suggestiveness and Dominique was perfect for this part. A fine film which I would recommend to everyone.
This is an example of a remake which (IMO) is better than the orif=ginal - there is much more suggestiveness and Dominique was perfect for this part. A fine film which I would recommend to everyone.