[REL] Architecture of Reassurance (2000)
- starfish21
- Posts: 3376
- Likes: 23307
- Joined: Tue May 23, 2006 1:00 am
[REL] Architecture of Reassurance (2000)
Architecture of Reassurance (2000)-short- 22min
http://rarefilmfinder.com/showfilm.php?id=1990
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0206558/
Dissatisfied with life at home, a young girl travels through other residences in her suburban neighborhood. She does what all of us would like to do: experience the domestic stories being played out by our neighbors. This tale is a voyeurist's paradise.
[Image]
[Image]
[Image]
[Image]
[Image]
[Image]
[Image]
[Image]
[Image]
[Image]
[Image]
[Image]
[Image]
[Image] [Image] [Image]
[Image] [Image] [Image]
[Image] [Image] [Image]
[Image] [Image] [Image]
[Image]
Like this post to see ed2k links [256.97 Mb]
http://rarefilmfinder.com/showfilm.php?id=1990
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0206558/
Dissatisfied with life at home, a young girl travels through other residences in her suburban neighborhood. She does what all of us would like to do: experience the domestic stories being played out by our neighbors. This tale is a voyeurist's paradise.
[Image]
[Image]
[Image]
[Image]
[Image]
[Image]
[Image]
[Image]
[Image]
[Image]
[Image]
[Image]
[Image]
[Image] [Image] [Image]
[Image] [Image] [Image]
[Image] [Image] [Image]
[Image] [Image] [Image]
[Image]
Like this post to see ed2k links [256.97 Mb]
- starfish21
- Posts: 3376
- Likes: 23307
- Joined: Tue May 23, 2006 1:00 am
Re: [REL] Architecture of Reassurance (2000)
75 views,10 likes and no comments.
same old,same old
same old,same old
- Pardal2008
- Posts: 341
- Likes: 158
- Joined: Wed Feb 22, 2012 10:23 pm
Re: [REL] Architecture of Reassurance (2000)
Yes yes starfish,
I prefer a different age group.
But thx for your work
Pardal
I prefer a different age group.
But thx for your work
Pardal
All the little girls are in love only to me
- Phuzzy4242
- Site Admin
- Posts: 7686
- Likes: 26735
- Joined: Sun Aug 23, 2009 1:00 am
Re: [REL] Architecture of Reassurance (2000)
I wish things were different but it is what it is. I'm sorry I didn't comment but I didn't download it. That doesn't mean it isn't appreciated, it probably means that the 1% of the people who bother thanking a poster haven't watched it yet to post a comment about it. Right now we have 1067 'members' of which maybe a dozen post anything at all. If you know of a way to get even a few of the leeches to contribute something, even just 'thanks', please let me know.starfish21 wrote:75 views,10 likes and no comments.
same old,same old
- starfish21
- Posts: 3376
- Likes: 23307
- Joined: Tue May 23, 2006 1:00 am
Re: [REL] Architecture of Reassurance (2000)
no sweat Phuzzy,i wish i hadn't commented now,for it was certain it would be you that answered ,and the remarks obviously were'nt intended for you,i just really can't understand how so many people can be so selfish,it's baffling.
Re: [REL] Architecture of Reassurance (2000)
Not this discussion again
10 likes is not so much to begin with. Here are 10 most liked posts for comparison:
[REL] She Monkeys / Apflickorna (2011) 61 likes
[REL] My Little Princess (2011) 50 likes
[REL] Laurita (2009) [short][Brazil] 46 likes
[REL] Farvel, jeg hedder Kurt (1969) 45 likes
[REL] Corpo Celeste (2011) 44 likes
[REL] La' os være (1975) 44 likes
[REL] Fleurs de sang (2002) 43 likes
[REL] La ritirata - short - 2008 42 likes
[REL] La Puce (1999) 42 likes
[REL] Farvel, jeg hedder Kurt (1969) and [REL] Nevinnost / Innocence (2011) 41 likes
10 likes is not so much to begin with. Here are 10 most liked posts for comparison:
[REL] She Monkeys / Apflickorna (2011) 61 likes
[REL] My Little Princess (2011) 50 likes
[REL] Laurita (2009) [short][Brazil] 46 likes
[REL] Farvel, jeg hedder Kurt (1969) 45 likes
[REL] Corpo Celeste (2011) 44 likes
[REL] La' os være (1975) 44 likes
[REL] Fleurs de sang (2002) 43 likes
[REL] La ritirata - short - 2008 42 likes
[REL] La Puce (1999) 42 likes
[REL] Farvel, jeg hedder Kurt (1969) and [REL] Nevinnost / Innocence (2011) 41 likes
- ptguardian
- Posts: 4479
- Likes: 12948
- Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2008 1:00 am
Re: [REL] Architecture of Reassurance (2000)
You were certain it would be phuzzy and you said same old, same old. You got that right. (Just joking O' phuzzy one)
It doesn't bother me too much for lack of response as much as it bothers me when people who are downloading don't share anything. I have been noticing on some files that when I log off the internet for the day that when I come back everyone is still at the same 'individual' point in what they need from me. When ever one of the regular FLM'rs is connected everyone only needs what I haven't shared yet. Meaning the regulars are sharing. If 'everyone' shares what they are downloading 'everyone' will get the file faster.
As for this file I did not go for it. So not much to comment about. thanks again is all I can say
It doesn't bother me too much for lack of response as much as it bothers me when people who are downloading don't share anything. I have been noticing on some files that when I log off the internet for the day that when I come back everyone is still at the same 'individual' point in what they need from me. When ever one of the regular FLM'rs is connected everyone only needs what I haven't shared yet. Meaning the regulars are sharing. If 'everyone' shares what they are downloading 'everyone' will get the file faster.
As for this file I did not go for it. So not much to comment about. thanks again is all I can say
Re: [REL] Architecture of Reassurance (2000)
starfish21 wrote:...
same old,same old
Pardal2008 wrote:Yes yes starfish,
I prefer a different age group.
But thx for your work
Pardal
As do I, Pardal, but it's not our comments starfish is, um.. commenting on..
I actually was able to grab this really quick and watch..
Interesting little indi short. No matter how 'normal' Alice wanted to be, she just doesn't seem cut out for 'normalcy'..
Credits show film was copy-written in 1999... We've been digging up a few films from over a decade back lately. Very cool!!
Thanks for bringing this to FLM, starfish. You've brought some really nice films to this forum, helping keep FLM alive! Your efforts are appreciated!
kev.
- starfish21
- Posts: 3376
- Likes: 23307
- Joined: Tue May 23, 2006 1:00 am
Re: [REL] Architecture of Reassurance (2000)
not a discussion,Mimzy,a comment,an observation,hopefully getting the attention of the non contributers.mimzy wrote:Not this discussion again
i'm not looking for a dicussion,but feel free to comment,preferrably without implying that i'm boring or frustrating you somehow.
i'm sure you're not trying to be nasty,but i'm entitled to say a few things now and again.
Re: [REL] Architecture of Reassurance (2000)
I just imagined multiple pages of frustrating "lurkers vs. posters" discussion added to this movie thread as it has happened few times before.starfish21 wrote:not a discussion,Mimzy,a comment,an observation,hopefully getting the attention of the non contributers.mimzy wrote:Not this discussion again
i'm not looking for a dicussion,but feel free to comment,preferrably without implying that i'm boring or frustrating you somehow.
i'm sure you're not trying to be nasty,but i'm entitled to say a few things now and again.
Well, some movies just aren't so interesting and sometimes even interesting movies get somehow overlooked. Those 10 members who "liked" this post may not have watched the movie yet. People just grab what they get as long as there are sources (I tend to disagree with PTg about the longevity of ed2k links, although ed2k can be reshared more easily than torrents).
Yep, I did download this myself (I hope ), but I haven't watched it yet. Don't have enough time to watch movies anymore