[REL] Requiem pro panenku (1991)

[ghost]

I present to you my bluray rip.

...and thanks, Night for the subs!

[deadman]

This looks depressing. Thank you, deadman!

English subtitles found here: https://subscene.com/subtitles/requiem- ... sh/2287537
and resynced for deadman's file:
Requiem pro panenku (1992).1080p.bluray.dts.x264-sos.en.srt
.
[After deadman's warning about the Czech subtitles, I will say that these SEEM to be synced properly -- but I did not check every single line.]

(I will post separately after I have ArtasKo's ulozto link downloaded, with synced English subtitles for that version.)

Many thanks for the English subs. Yes, this is not a light comedy that's for sure. Good movie though.

Something was wrong with my original MEGA link - it's fixed now.

[Night457]

ArtasKo's ulozto file kept crashing VLC on my old computer, but that seems to be a problem with my computer and H265 files. It plays just fine on my blu-ray player, and should also play on computers that are not so ancient. Some people may prefer to go for this smaller version. I verified in SubtitleEdit (and my player) that the Subscene English subtitle is already in sync:

[David32441]

I saw this a decade ago on some satellite channel - never thought I'd see it at Bluray res. But flicking through it this seriously needs a de-noise filter! But I don't have After Effects to do justice to this
With all that grain Deadman this really needed that 8gb encode! Grain is a right pain to encode - eats data! And well done for the alternative links - 8gb on emule might have been painful!

[ghost]

But flicking through it this seriously needs a de-noise filter!

It's natural film grain and I'm ok with it. It's an old movie.

[David32441]

I tested about 10 different shots. The Topaz medium quality totally eliminates the grain! This makes it look too smooth. But then I feel if you blend the Topaz with the original keeping say 25% of the original you get a pristine film with a tiny amount of grain - a bit like the grain effect we apply after an upscale.
Now I don't mind film grain - but a lot of scenes are just tremendous noise - way beyond film grain.
I'll do a test - but on my graphics card it'll take 2 days to render the medium quality at 1080p!

[ghost]

You are still at v2.6.4? You could use the Proteus model and only remove the noise wthout any other changes. (It's already in 1080p).

But as I said: I don't need any editing.

[David32441]

You are still at v2.6.4? You could use the Proteus model and only remove the noise wthout any other changes. (It's already in 1080p).

But as I said: I don't need any editing.

The new version was not stable, always wanted to be online, so I reverted back to the older model. Yeah, I wouldn't be resizing - just denoising.

[ghost]

The new version was not stable

Yes, 3.0 was still pretty buggy, but it's getting better and better. And the Proteus auto-model works just great in many cases. I don't like the Artemis medium-quality model very much. Looks often too artificial.

[David32441]

I know we don't post clips - but before I leave my PC on for 48+ hours trying to remove noise I thought I'd do a 1minute sample of the improvement:
[link removed by user due to no-clip posting rule]
If you compare it to the same scene in the original 1080p you'll see the differnce. The tiles and the water drops on the taps look so clear. I encoded it with the noise set to 2.3 to add some back in rather than merge with the original.
Even whacking the noise to the maximum (8 I think) I couldn't re-create how much noise/grain there was in the original clip!