TAC

Child movie related or un-related discussion can go here i.e. movies, images, links, tv, music etc. All posts allowed unless specified otherwise in the rules. Please refrain from posting flames, personal information, using this board as a private message system or help questions.
User avatar
Triela
Posts: 418
Likes:
Joined: Sun Jul 05, 2020 3:42 pm

Re: TAC

Post by Triela »   0 likes

Amadeus wrote:It's not a matter of reliability, but history. I assume everyone here takes every precaution not to link themselves to sights that could potentially harm them or the forum... Just the idea that it is a research link (which leads to the idea of child porn), automatically makes me think your link may be part of the research. And when I think of the terms research and child pornography, I think of government.
....REALLY wonder how you appreciate the fact that many of these movies can be found on the most generalistic-ish of video sites, won't name names...like, you know, the most notorious IMHO, of these, the Lara&Eva one, is there, totally uncensored... ?
Not to mention all those series from Lederhosen Land.
taclink
Posts: 1
Likes:
Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2021 9:38 am

Re: TAC

Post by taclink »   0 likes

Can anyone provide a link to the latest tac? or any version of tac?
User avatar
Ziggy Plock
Posts: 310
Likes:
Joined: Mon Aug 10, 2020 10:11 am

Re: TAC

Post by Ziggy Plock »   1 likes

Triela wrote:
Rich_Visiting wrote:
GrumpySneezy wrote: Reminds of Teens against Tobacco use or T.a.T.u
[img]
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BLl4kSwCMAE ... me=360x360[/img]
Why you bringing up TAC with a poverty TATU image? Which quite frankly is an insult to the genius of TATU? I don't get it.
it's teans, even I appreciate them. Plus, image has been censored. Don't see the prob...

PS... otoh, they might not have been teans in that pic. but they were when start.
My, my, my, isn't everyone overly sensitive.... :D :lol: ;) :?: :?:
also, "genius" ??? They're russians, no genius there, just fake lesbian marketing ploys....
also, isn't TaC perfect for this site, since teens are too... appreciated here? no need to get snobbish... imho
——————————————————————————A tribute to Lost Movies===My avatar: youtu.be/SdqsgEOBOlc——————————————————————————
[Image]
User avatar
Ziggy Plock
Posts: 310
Likes:
Joined: Mon Aug 10, 2020 10:11 am

Re: TAC

Post by Ziggy Plock »   1 likes

chans123 wrote:I find the info of clip#7.... It is from a movie called "La Rage Au Coeur".
The girl in this clip is Sarah-Laure Estragnat. BTW, I wouldn't find this info without reading the new edition of TAC.
All the same, it falsely claims that Linda Regan is born in 5-11-1959, while she's 10 years older, in all actuality.
Last edited by Ziggy Plock on Mon Apr 25, 2022 6:43 am, edited 1 time in total.
——————————————————————————A tribute to Lost Movies===My avatar: youtu.be/SdqsgEOBOlc——————————————————————————
[Image]
karmykel2
Posts: 11
Likes:
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2019 9:25 am

Re: TAC

Post by karmykel2 »   0 likes

TAC corrects errors that are brought to attention.
User avatar
Ziggy Plock
Posts: 310
Likes:
Joined: Mon Aug 10, 2020 10:11 am

Re: TAC

Post by Ziggy Plock »   0 likes

karmykel2 wrote:TAC corrects errors that are brought to attention.
Look, there's no bigger fan of TAC on these boards than I, but brought to attention, like .... how? This claim has been there at least since the 12th edition in 2010...
——————————————————————————A tribute to Lost Movies===My avatar: youtu.be/SdqsgEOBOlc——————————————————————————
[Image]
karmykel2
Posts: 11
Likes:
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2019 9:25 am

Re: TAC

Post by karmykel2 »   0 likes

But you have to understand that years ago other sites that seemed reliable listed incorrect 1959 birthdates for Linda Regan, instead of 1949 as they do today
User avatar
Ziggy Plock
Posts: 310
Likes:
Joined: Mon Aug 10, 2020 10:11 am

Re: TAC

Post by Ziggy Plock »   0 likes

karmykel2 wrote:But you have to understand that years ago other sites that seemed reliable listed incorrect 1959 birthdates for Linda Regan, instead of 1949 as they do today
Not really the point. The point is that the mistake is STILL there, has been for twelve years and at least 10 or 11 new editions.
Which negates your remark that the TAC corrects errors. This is a biggie, IMHO. But on that particular one, YMMV.
Still, it's a great resource, there's a lot of work, and everyone can think what they want about their stances, pleas, calls or whatever you wanna call it, but it's a very extensive piece of labor, with an unparalleled scope, right there..... :thumbsup :clap
——————————————————————————A tribute to Lost Movies===My avatar: youtu.be/SdqsgEOBOlc——————————————————————————
[Image]
karmykel2
Posts: 11
Likes:
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2019 9:25 am

Re: TAC

Post by karmykel2 »   0 likes

Linda Regan was deleted today from all locations in TAC's master file, so she will not appear in subsequent revisions.
reptile12
Posts: 224
Likes:
Joined: Sat May 18, 2019 5:38 pm

Re: TAC

Post by reptile12 »   0 likes

Here are some actresses I found might be relevant to TAC:

Silje Hagrim Dahl in Reckless:
[Image]

Martine Johansen in Varg Veum: Skriften Paa Veggen:
[Image]

(Maybe) Leelee Sobieski in Uprising (born 1983 June, shooting in march, not sure how long):
[Image]

Ana de Armas in Madrigal (?):
[Image]
Post Reply